Abstract ABSTRACT: Public outcry over widespread disclosures of corporate fraud, bribes, and illegal political contributions has resulted in greater responsibility being thrust upon both internal and external auditors for the prevention and detection of corporate irregularities. Little is known, however, concerning the potential effectiveness of the internal or external auditor in preventing corporate irregularities. In this study, it was hypothesized that an increase in the perceived "aggressiveness" of the internal and external auditor in detecting corporate irregularities would function as a deterrent. These two hypotheses were tested in a field experiment employing business managers. Neither of the hypotheses was supported. These results have important implications for the role of the internal and external auditor as "police officers" in corporate society.
Uecker et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: