What question did this study set out to answer?

The aim is to understand how equity is perceived among different stakeholders involved in conservation efforts within co-governance frameworks.

March 25, 2026Open Access

Unveiling disparities between planned and perceived equity arrangements in protected area co-governance: Evidence from the North Luangwa Ecosystem in Zambia

Key Points

The aim is to understand how equity is perceived among different stakeholders involved in conservation efforts within co-governance frameworks.
Conducted key informant interviews with 15 government officials and 15 NGO representatives.
Facilitated 20 focus group discussions with local community members from six Village Action Groups.
Analyzed perceptions of distributional and procedural equity in relation to conservation goals.
Local communities expressed dissatisfaction with equity measures due to perceived shortcomings in addressing wildlife coexistence costs.
There was a notable sense of misrecognition among communities, feeling that conservation priorities overshadowed their well-being.
Divergent equity perceptions indicated that top-down approaches could jeopardize local support for conservation initiatives.

Abstract

Environmental equity discussions have increasingly influenced conservation policies at local, national, and international levels. Various community-based natural resource management interventions strive to incorporate equity within conservation practices, with a particular focus on resolving human-wildlife conflicts. Nevertheless, the challenge persists in ensuring that equity measures translate into both tangible and perceived fairness. This study examined and disaggregated perceptions of equity among representatives from government and non-government entities, and local community members residing within co-governance frameworks that honor traditional governance structures in three Game Management Areas adjacent to the North Luangwa National Park in Zambia. We conducted key informant interviews with 15 Government officials and 15 NGO representatives in conjunction with 20 focus group discussions with local community members from six Village Action Groups. The government and NGO actors reported efforts to enact both distributional and procedural equity concurrently with conservation aims. Despite intentions to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts and foster cooperative conservation, these measures precipitated local dissatisfaction, as they perceived that the equity-facilitating interventions inadequately addressed the costs associated with coexisting with wildlife. Furthermore, a profound sense of misrecognition was felt as wildlife and conservation objectives appeared prioritized over their well-being. Divergent perceptions of equity influence conservation efficacy, as top-down equity measures may boost biodiversity yet simultaneously diminish local support and stewardship, thereby risking long-term community engagement. The disparity between anticipated and realized equity outcomes underscores the necessity of prioritizing recognitional equity by acknowledging the heterogeneity of interests, capacities, and influence of local populations before and during the implementation of conservation interventions.

Unveiling disparities between planned and perceived equity arrangements in protected area co-governance: Evidence from the North Luangwa Ecosystem in Zambia

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study