Accurate prediction of surface rupture induced by seismogenic fault displacement is essential for the seismic safety assessment of major engineering projects. Most existing numerical simulations adopt quasi-static approaches, in which the effect of fault displacement is simplified as static loading. As a result, these methods cannot represent the dynamic characteristics of the fault rupture process, such as stress-wave propagation, soil inertial effects, and the influence of dynamic loading paths on rupture extension in soil layers. To address this issue, a full-process simulation method is established for simulating rupture of overlying soil subjected to dynamic fault displacement: Firstly, a non-uniform dynamic fault displacement loading is formulated for the two sides of the fault based on viscoelastic artificial boundaries, allowing the differential motion of the bedrock on both sides of the fault to be represented. Secondly, an improved dynamic skeleton curve constitutive model of soil is developed by introducing a minimum modulus constraint, providing an improved description of soil nonlinear dynamic behavior from small-strain hysteresis to large-strain shear failure. The reliability of the proposed method is verified through element-level tests and horizontal-site response simulation. As a benchmark, its ability to reproduce key rupture characteristics under quasi-static conditions is also assessed by comparison with classical quasi-static rupture studies. The method is then applied to simulate rupture extension and deformation response of overlying soil under strike-slip fault displacement. The results show that, compared to quasi-static analysis, dynamic fault displacement produces similar cumulative slip for surface rupture initiation and full connection, but induces transient amplification of peak surface displacement and a wider deformation zone with gentler displacement gradients. These findings demonstrate the necessity of considering dynamic fault dislocation of bedrock–overlying soil interaction in seismic assessments of engineering projects crossing active faults.
Wang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.