PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 18, 2008New England Journal of Medicine1,589 citations

Rhythm Control versus Rate Control for Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure

View Full Paper
DRDenis RoyMTMario TalajicSNStanley Nattel

Structured PICO

Does a routine strategy of rhythm control reduce death from cardiovascular causes in patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure?

P
Population
Patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure
I
Intervention
Routine strategy of rhythm control
C
Comparator
Rate-control strategy
O
Outcome
Death from cardiovascular causeshard clinical

A routine rhythm-control strategy does not reduce cardiovascular mortality compared to rate control in patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure.

Abstract

In patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure, a routine strategy of rhythm control does not reduce the rate of death from cardiovascular causes, as compared with a rate-control strategy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00597077.)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Roy et al. (2008) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cdb9be038a83c39e428d21https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0708789
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper