The article examines the evolution of the corporate sustainability reporting paradigm and its implications for the accounting profession, emphasizing the convergence between the conceptual, regulatory, and applicative dimensions. In a global context characterized by increasing demands for transparency and corporate responsibility, sustainability reporting is becoming not only a compliance tool but also a strategic vector of managerial decisions and added value for stakeholders. The paper analyses the international standards issued by the IFRS Foundation and the ISSB (IFRS S1 and IFRS S2), as well as recent European initiatives, including the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), underlining the related demands and opportunities for professional accountants. It details the consolidated responsibilities of expert accountants, highlighting their essential role in collecting, verifying, and interpreting financial and non-financial information, and the need to develop multidimensional competencies in the field of ESG (environmental, social, and governance). The application section proposes methodologies for implementing sustainability reporting, including the integration of ESG performance indicators into accounting systems, non-financial audit procedures, and best practices for companies. Concrete examples on reporting greenhouse gas emissions, managing social indicators, and verifying non-financial data illustrate how theory is translated into practice. The paper highlights the added value for professional accountants: strengthening their strategic status, emerging opportunities for ESG consulting, and supporting the managerial decision-making process. The conclusions emphasize that sustainability reporting is an evolving imperative for the accounting profession, requiring the adoption of an integrated and proactive view in presenting and analysing corporate information.
Maria Bursuc (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: