The performance of ballasted railway tracks under cyclic loading is a critical issue in urban railway systems, where high traffic frequency and geometric constraints accelerate track degradation, leading to the accumulation of plastic deformations that may reduce operational efficiency. This study presents a numerical framework for rail track performance assessment based on two complementary modeling approaches: a fully continuous Finite Difference Method (FDM) model, and a hybrid Discrete Element Method–Finite Difference Method (DEM–FDM) model. The continuous FDM simulations are employed to evaluate the global mechanical response of the track support system and to compute conventional stability indicators, including the factor of safety (FS). In parallel, the hybrid DEM–FDM simulations explicitly represent the ballast layer using DEM to capture inter-particle interactions, accumulation of permanent deformation, and particle fragmentation under cyclic loading, while rails, sleepers, sub-ballast, and subgrade are modeled using FDM to describe system-level load transfer. Ballast performance is assessed by linking safety factors obtained from the continuous models with mechanically derived permanent deformation and stress measures extracted from the hybrid simulations. The proposed dual-modeling framework enables a systematic investigation of the influence of ballast layer thickness and material type on deformation accumulation, stress transmission, and granular degradation mechanisms. The results reveal distinct behavioral trends among different ballast materials, showing that increased ballast thickness generally improves track performance, while material-specific degradation mechanisms govern the evolution of permanent deformation under repeated loading. The proposed approach establishes a quantitative bridge between traditional stability-based design metrics and deformation-based performance indicators, providing a rational basis for performance-based evaluation, comparison, and optimization of ballast configurations through a set of robust numerically derived relationships for railway track design.
Olivera et al. (Thu,) studied this question.