A targeted cfDNA-based multi-cancer early detection test achieved 83.1% sensitivity (95% CI: 81.5-84.6%) and 95.4% specificity (95% CI: 94.4-96.4%) for detecting 20 cancer types.
Case-Control (n=3,988)
Blinded
Yes
Does a targeted cfDNA-based MCED test accurately detect cancer compared to traditional biomarkers in adults?
A targeted cfDNA-based MCED test demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for detecting multiple cancer types, particularly those prevalent in Asia, offering a promising non-invasive screening tool.
Absolute Event Rate: 83.1% vs 95.4%
Abstract Early cancer detection significantly improves survival, particularly for high-burden cancers across Asia that are often diagnosed late. Plasma-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a promising non-invasive biomarker for identifying cancer earlier than conventional methods. This study evaluated the performance of a targeted multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test that analyzes tumour-associated mutations in cfDNA to detect 20 cancer types commonly seen in Asian populations. In this retrospective, multicentre validation study, participants aged ≥20 years with either confirmed cancer or cancer-free status were recruited. Plasma cfDNA was sequenced using a targeted panel constructed from large genomic datasets. Machine learning models were trained and validated in a blinded manner to assess diagnostic performance. Among 2342 cancer cases and 1646 controls, the MCED test achieved a sensitivity of 83.1% (95% CI: 81.5-84.6%) and specificity of 95.4% (95% CI: 94.4-96.4%), with a false-positive rate of 4.6%. Performance surpassed that of traditional biomarkers such as CEA. Notably, high sensitivity was observed in cancers of major concern in Asia—liver, gastric, pancreatic, bile duct, and nasopharyngeal cancers—with early-stage detection ranging from 75.0-91.3% and late-stage detection from 95.5-100%. These findings support the potential of cfDNA-based MCED testing as a non-invasive, complementary screening approach for populations in Asia. Its strong performance across multiple high-mortality cancers underscores its value for early detection, risk stratification, and integration into regional cancer control strategies. Citation Format: Chee-Onn Leong, Boon Shing Tan, Hiu Ching Toh, Ee Mun Loo, Anand Mohan, Teryna Thu, Zhi Win Ng, Xin Yi Chew, Chin King Looi, Felicia Fei Lei Chung, Chun Wai Mai. Clinical validation of a targeted multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test using cfDNA mutation and integrated genomic signatures analysis abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1113.
Leong et al. (Fri,) conducted a case-control in Cancer (n=3,988). Targeted multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test vs. Cancer-free controls was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity. A targeted cfDNA-based multi-cancer early detection test achieved 83.1% sensitivity (95% CI: 81.5-84.6%) and 95.4% specificity (95% CI: 94.4-96.4%) for detecting 20 cancer types.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: