Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The practice of rewilding has been both promoted and criticized in recent years. Benefits include flexibility to react to environmental change and the promotion of opportunities for society to reconnect with nature. Criticisms include the lack of a clear conceptualization of rewilding, insufficient knowledge about possible outcomes, and the perception that rewilding excludes people from landscapes. Here, we present a framework for rewilding that addresses these concerns. We suggest that rewilding efforts should target trophic complexity, natural disturbances, and dispersal as interacting processes that can improve ecosystem resilience and maintain biodiversity. We propose a structured approach to rewilding projects that includes assessment of the contributions of nature to people and the social-ecological constraints on restoration.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Andrea Perino
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research
Henrique M. Pereira
Universidade do Porto
Laetitia M. Navarro
Estación Biológica de Doñana
Science
Aarhus University
University of Sussex
University of Göttingen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Perino et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7d0b511d83f35e5ae2a6e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav5570