February 15, 2005

The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision‐making tasks

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We conclude that OPTION is sufficiently reliable to be used for formal assessment at the level of the whole instrument (all 12 items).

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Elwyn et al. (Tue,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d88fc7c025a7c015bee1df — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00311.x

Also consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials· 2004 · 2,574 citations
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use· 1989 · 9,651 citations
Theory and Methods of Social Research.· 1968 · 251 citations
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use· 2015 · 2,394 citations
Principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis· 1992 · 559 citations

Authors

Glyn Elwyn

Dartmouth College

Hayley Hutchings

Swansea University

Adrian Edwards

Health and Care Research Wales

Journals

Health Expectations

Actions

Institutions

Radboud University Nijmegen

Radboud University Medical Center

University of Wales

References and Citations

Connected Papers

Building similarity graph...

Analyzing shared references across papers

The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision‐making tasks

Key Points

Abstract

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Cite this study

Also consider

Authors

Journals

Actions

Institutions

References and Citations

Citation Network

Connected Papers

Discussion

Also consider