PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1989Physical review. B, Condensed matter1,396 citations

Two-dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet at low temperatures

View Full Paper
SCSudip ChakravartyBHBertrand I. HalperinDNDavid R. Nelson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

It is argued that the long-wavelength, low-temperature behavior of a two-dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet can be described by a quantum nonlinear model in two space plus one time dimension, at least in the range of parameters where the model has long-range order at zero temperature. The properties of the quantum nonlinear model are analyzed approximately using the one-loop renormalization-group method. When the model has long-range order at T=0, the long-wavelength behavior at finite temperatures can be described by a purely classical model, with parameters renormalized by the quantum fluctuations. The low-temperature behavior of the correlation length and the static and dynamic staggered-spin-correlation functions for the quantum antiferromagnet can be predicted, in principle, with no adjustable parameters, from the results of simulations of the classical model on a lattice, combined with a two-loop renormalization-group analysis of the classical nonlinear model, a calculation of the zero-temperature spin-wave stiffness constant and uniform susceptibility of the quantum antiferromagnet, and a one-loop analysis of the conversion from a lattice cutoff to the wave-vector cutoff introduced by quantum mechanics when the spin-wave frequency exceeds T. Applying this approach to the spin- Heisenberg model on a square lattice, with nearest-neighbor interactions only, we obtain a result for the correlation length which is in good agreement with the data of Endoh et al. on La₂CuO₄, if the spin-wave velocity is assumed to be 0. 67 eV. We also argue that the data on La₂CuO₄ cannot be easily explained by any model in which an isolated CuO₂ layer would not have long-range antiferromagnetic order at T=0. Our theory also predicts a quasielastic peak of a few meV width at 300 K when k1 (where k is wave-vector transfer and is the correlation length). The extent to which this dynamical prediction agrees with experiments remains to be seen. In an appendix, we discuss the effect of introducing a frustrating second-nearest-neighbor coupling for the antiferromagnet on the square lattice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chakravarty et al. (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d923ff64ccad297883583dhttps://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.39.2344
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper