Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Electrostatic potentials and Mulliken net atomic charges were calculated from STO ‐3G, 6‐31G, and 6‐31G** SCF ‐ MO wavefunctions for hydrogen fluoride, water, ammonia, methane, acetylene, ethylene, carbon dioxide, formaldehyde, methanol, formamide, formic acid, acetonitrile, diborane, and carbonate ion. In each case optimized net atomic charges (potential‐derived charges) were also obtained by fitting the electrostatic potentials calculated directly from the wavefunctions in a shell enveloping the molecules outside of their van der Waals surfaces. The electrostatic potentials calculated from the potential‐derived charge distributions were then compared with the defined quantum mechanical electrostatic potentials and with the electrostatic potentials of the Mulliken charge distributions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
S. R. Cox
University of Louisville
Donald E. Williams
Northwestern University
Journal of Computational Chemistry
University of Louisville
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cox et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9dbb80d540cafc5837d2a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540020312