December 5, 2012Open Access

Implications of distributed hydrologic model parameterization on water fluxes at multiple scales and locations

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Key Points A calibrated model does not guarantee cross‐scale and location transferability Calibration parameters of MPR exhibit quasi‐scale invariance, but HRU does not MPR also outperfromed HRU for parameter transferability across locations

Read Full Paperexternally

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db0bf6387cf706986880aa https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2012wr012195

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Multiscale parameter regionalization of a grid‐based hydrologic model at the mesoscale2010 · 901 citations
2Excluding Organic Matter Content from Pedotransfer Predictors of Soil Water Retention2007 · 155 citations
3Spatial Averaging of van Genuchten Hydraulic Parameters for Steady-State Flow in Heterogeneous Soils: A Numerical Study2002 · 101 citations
4A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes1996 · 3,086 citations
5Spatial Averaging of van Genuchten Hydraulic Parameters for Steady‐State Flow in Heterogeneous Soils: A Numerical Study2002 · 86 citations

Bookmark

View Full Paper