October 8, 2021Open Access

Differences in finished case quality between Invisalign and traditional fixed appliances:

ELEric Cheng-Huang LinUniversity of Dallas KJKatie JulienTexas A&M Health Science Center MKMatthew J. KesterkeTexas A&M University System

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

While patients with simple malocclusions require 4.8 months longer treatment times with aligners than traditional braces, the treatment and 6-month posttreatment occlusal outcomes are similar.

AIに質問

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lin et al. (Fri,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db232b7a67537a8ba3d047 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2319/032921-246.1

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1The ABO discrepancy index: a measure of case complexity2004 · 190 citations
2Northcroft Lecture: How has the spectrum of orthodontics changed over the past decades?2011 · 62 citations
3Long-term posttreatment changes measured by the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system2005 · 79 citations
4Changes in mandibular incisor position and arch form resulting from Invisalign correction of the crowded dentition treated nonextraction2015 · 52 citations
5Periodontal health in teenagers treated with removable aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances2015 · 162 citations

AIに質問

Bookmark

View Full Paper