Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We present an elementary proof of the quantum de Finetti representation theorem, a quantum analog of de Finetti’s classical theorem on exchangeable probability assignments. This contrasts with the original proof of Hudson and Moody Z. Wahrschein. verw. Geb. 33, 343 (1976), which relies on advanced mathematics and does not share the same potential for generalization. The classical de Finetti theorem provides an operational definition of the concept of an unknown probability in Bayesian probability theory, where probabilities are taken to be degrees of belief instead of objective states of nature. The quantum de Finetti theorem, in a closely analogous fashion, deals with exchangeable density-operator assignments and provides an operational definition of the concept of an “unknown quantum state” in quantum-state tomography. This result is especially important for information-based interpretations of quantum mechanics, where quantum states, like probabilities, are taken to be states of knowledge rather than states of nature. We further demonstrate that the theorem fails for real Hilbert spaces and discuss the significance of this point.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carlton M. Caves
University of New Mexico
Christopher A. Fuchs
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Rüdiger Schack
University of New Mexico
Journal of Mathematical Physics
CERN Bulletin
University of New Mexico
Royal Holloway University of London
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Caves et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69dbb8cf3d9adb00e7684cfd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1494475
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: