PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 2, 2021Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics172 citationsOpen Access

The Role of Real‐World Evidence in FDA‐Approved New Drug and Biologics License Applications

View Full Paper
CPChristina A. PurpuraEGElizabeth M. GarryNHNicholaas Honig

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is open to accepting real-world evidence (RWE) to support its assessment of medical products. However, RWE stakeholders lack a shared understanding of FDA's evidentiary expectations for the use of RWE in applications for new drugs and biologics. We conducted a systematic review of publicly available FDA approval documents from January 2019 to June 2021. We sought to quantify, by year, how many approvals incorporated RWE in any form, and the intended use of RWE in those applications. Among approvals with RWE intended to support safety and/or effectiveness, we classified whether and how those studies impacted FDA's benefit-risk considerations, whether those studies were incorporated into the product label, and the therapeutic area of the medical product. Finally, we qualified FDA's documented feedback where available. We found that 116 approvals incorporated RWE in any form, with the proportion of approvals incorporating RWE increasing each year. Of these approvals, 88 included an RWE study intended to provide evidence of safety or effectiveness. Among these 88 approvals, 65 of the studies influenced FDA's final decision and 38 were included in product labels. The 88 approvals spanned 18 therapeutic areas. FDA's feedback on RWE study quality included methodological issues, sample size concerns, omission of patient level data, and other limitations. Based on these findings, we would anticipate that future guidance on FDA's evidentiary expectations of RWE use will incorporate fit-for-purpose real-world data selection and careful attention to study design and analysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Purpura et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd25455f91138675359f70https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2474
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1FDA postmarketing safety labeling changes: What have we learned since 2010 about impacts on prescribing rates, drug utilization, and treatment outcomes2020 · 8 citations
  2. 2Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Real World Evidence: Neither Magic Nor Myth2020 · 205 citations
  3. 3Physicians’ prescribing attitudes to combined therapy with statins and fibrates2003 · 6 citations
  4. 4Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.1974 · 9,604 citations
  5. 5Characteristics of non-randomised studies using comparisons with external controls submitted for regulatory approval in the USA and Europe: a systematic review2019 · 101 citations