PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 20, 2026Scientific Reports1 citationsOpen Access

Deficit-irrigation management for sustainable grape production (Vitis vinifera L.): different regimes to assess yield and berry quality under arid conditions

AEAbdel-Fattah M. EL-SalhyESEl-Nouby H. SalemMMMoustafa M. A. Mohamed

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the effects of different deficit irrigation regimes on grape yield and quality under arid conditions.
  • Conducted in a private orchard in Luxor Governorate, Egypt over two seasons (2024 and 2025).
  • Used a completely randomized block design with three irrigation treatments: 100%, 80%, and 60% of crop water requirements.
  • Assessed the growth, productivity, and physicochemical characteristics of grapes.
  • 80% crop water requirement treatment resulted in a 3.70% yield decrease compared to full irrigation.
  • However, the water savings from the deficit irrigation compensated for the yield reduction.
  • 80% CWR significantly improved the physicochemical quality of the grape clusters.

Abstract

Water scarcity is one of the main obstacles to agricultural development, particularly in Egypt. Grapevines are sensitive to drought and therefore depend heavily on improved irrigation regimes. It could be a crucial approach for the agricultural development of any country. This study evaluated the effect of deficit irrigation regimes on the growth, productivity, and cluster quality of the Flame seedless grapevines during two successive seasons (2024 and 2025) at a private orchard in the Luxor Governorate, Egypt. Grapevines were distributed in a completely randomized block design (CRBD) with three irrigation treatments and three replicates of each: (T1)—100% of crop water requirements (CWR), serving as the control; (T2)—80% of CWR; and (T3)—60% of CWR. The results indicated that vines receiving 80% CWR had a yield decrease of 3.70% compared to full irrigation; however, the amount of water saved throughout this process compensated for the lower yield, thus it did not have a significant overall impact. The irrigation treatment had an impact on all of the cluster’s assessed physicochemical characteristics, with irrigation at 80% CWR being the best strategy for reducing water consumption and enhancing cluster quality. By balancing resource conservation, productivity, and quality, 80% CWR represents a viable solution to meet the dual challenges of sustainable agriculture and water scarcity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

EL-Salhy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e5c27e03c2939914028a9dhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47407-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Improving Water Use Efficiency, Yield, and Fruit Quality of Crimson Seedless Grapevines under Drought Stress2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Relationships between grape composition of Tempranillo variety and available soil water and water stress under different weather conditions2019 · 42 citations
  3. 3A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material1975 · 1,341 citations
  4. 4General Viticulture1974 · 526 citations
  5. 5Effect of Irrigation Levels on Growth and Fruiting of Manfalouty Pomegranate Trees Grown in New Reclaimed Region2023 · 2 citations