PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Persistent Homology of Riemann Zero Spacings: an Exploratory Study in 1D and 3D Time-delay Embeddings

View Full Paper
DZDimitrios Zampos

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore persistent homology of Riemann zeros and its relationship with eigenvalue distributions.
  • Analyzed gap sequences of the first 10,000 Riemann zeros using persistent homology techniques.
  • Performed 3D analysis with time-delay embeddings and Alpha-complex persistence.
  • Conducted robustness checks on offsets with varying sample sizes and time-delay parameters.
  • Found a clear discrimination of Riemann gaps from Poisson-gap benchmarks with a maximum ratio of 3.44×.
  • Riemann zeros were consistently closer to proper GUE than exponential references within a 3.3–6.9× range.
  • Identified a stable residual offset of 8–9% below proper GUE after various checks.

Abstract

We explore what persistent homology, applied to the nearest-neighbour gap sequence of the first 10, 000 non-trivial Riemann zeros, can and cannot see about the Montgomery–Odlyzko law. Two main observations emerge. First, in a one-dimensional filtration on locally unfolded gaps, the β₀ statistic — essentially the single-linkage component count at threshold ε — cleanly separates the Riemann sequence and a proper GUE bulk eigenvalue control from an exponential (Poisson-gap) reference; a maximum discrimination ratio of 3. 44× is reached around ε ≈ 0. 20. Riemann and proper GUE agree with each other to within 5% across the entire ε range, while both differ from i. i. d. samples of the Wigner surmise by about 11σ, showing that the statistic is sensitive to multi-point correlations rather than to the marginal spacing distribution alone. Second, we lift the analysis into 3D via time-delay embeddings (sₙ, s₍+⏣, s₍+₂⏣) and compute Alpha-complex persistence through dimension 2. Wasserstein-1 distances on the resulting diagrams place Riemann 3. 3–6. 9× closer to proper GUE than to the exponential reference, in each of H₀, H₁, and H₂, at time-delay τ=3. A small residual offset persists — Riemann total persistence sits about 8–9% below proper GUE — and we subject it to three robustness checks: (i) a matrix-size scan over M ∈ 800, 1600, 2400 of the GUE generator, which rules out finite-N of the control as the explanation; (ii) a matched-scale comparison of three non-overlapping Riemann sub-samples against fifteen pooled GUE replicates, which shows the offset is not within sub-sample variance (permutation p = 0. 0012) ; and (iii) a scan of the time-delay parameter τ ∈ 1, 2, 3, which shows that a portion of the apparent τ=1 offset (roughly 3–4 percentage points) is an artifact of the fact that consecutive triples at τ=1 share two of three coordinates, and that the remaining 8–9% is stable across τ. We report this stable residual as an open observation rather than a claim. As a cautionary methodological note, we also show that a naive global normalization of Riemann gaps (instead of the standard local Riemann–von Mangoldt unfolding) produces a dramatic but entirely artifactual monotone trend in all Hₖ as a function of height γ. We apply the 1D filtration to confirm the Lehmer close-pair near γ ≈ 7005. We make no analytic claims; this is an exploratory note intended to characterize what a topological eye sees when looking at the zeta zeros and to document the methodological traps that appear along the way.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dimitrios Zampos (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0b50553a5433e34b51a5https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19693830
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper