This research article explores whether the climate transition risk (CTR) and climate physical risk (CPR) transmit greater shocks towards the sustainable, gold-backed, energy-related and Sharia-compliant cryptocurrencies during bullish market conditions as compared with the normal and bearish market conditions. We employ the novel quantile vector auto-regression (QVAR)-based connectivity framework. Overall findings suggested that CPR and CTR transmitted greater shocks towards cryptocurrency classes during extremely high and lower quantiles as compared with the median quantile. This U-shaped and non-linear climate risks shock transmission indicates that Sharia-compliant, energy-related and gold-backed cryptocurrencies become more vulnerable during extreme market conditions (higher and lower quantiles) and may not consistently serve as reliable hedging or diversification instruments, particularly during periods of heightened climate uncertainty. Overall findings suggested that both the CPR and CTR transmitted greater shocks towards energy-related, gold-backed, and Sharia-compliant cryptocurrencies as compared with the sustainable cryptocurrencies, across all the quantiles. Therefore, sustainable cryptocurrencies, particularly those with energy-efficient consensus mechanisms such as Stellar, Cardano and Ripple, exhibited resilience to climate risks and can therefore function as stabilizing core holdings in diversified portfolios. Fund managers should incorporate a rebalancing strategy that increases allocation to these climate-resilient, sustainable digital assets during periods of elevated climate risk. Fund managers should integrate CPR and CTR into the quantile-domain forecasting frameworks for predicting digital asset market returns to enhance financial stability. Portfolio managers should undertake dynamic and quantile-contingent climate risk hedging strategies that account for tail-risk exposure rather than relying on average market behavior.
Tabash et al. (Tue,) studied this question.