Impulsive alpha (α)-stable noise, characterized by heavy tails and intense outliers, is a key ingredient in simulating financial, medical, seismic, and digital communication technologies. It poses versatile challenges to conventional machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting noise parameters for multidisciplinary artificial intelligence (AI)-embedded devices. In this study, we adopted a two-phase methodology to investigate the complexity and performance of supervised ML algorithms while classifying impulsive noise parameters. We generated synthetic datasets of α-stable noise distributions for experimentation in a controlled environment. It was followed by experimental evaluation to derive the complexity and performance of ML classifiers—k-nearest neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), Decision Tree (DT), and Random Forest (RF). Moreover, we employed a very high channel noise level of −15 dB in the test datasets to ensure that the derived analysis applies to real-world devices. The results demonstrate the high performance of DT and RF in structured binary classification of the α regime and the sign of skewness, while incurring satisfactory computational costs. However, SVM and kNN are comparatively more robust for multi-class classification, albeit with higher memory and training costs. On the contrary, NB fails to address the skewed and impulsive behavior of α-stable noise. We observed that even the most effective classifiers struggle to achieve perfect accuracy in multi-class classification. Overall, the experimental results reveal significant trade-off relationships between the complexity and performance of ML classifiers. Conclusively, simple models are well-suited for coarse-grained tasks, such as α-approximation and sign-of-skewness classification. In contrast, sophisticated models can be deployed to predict noise parameters to some extent. Our study provides a clear set of trade-offs for future applied AI devices that address adversarial and impulsive noise.
Ahmed et al. (Thu,) studied this question.