PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 1985New England Journal of Medicine459 citations

The Western Washington Randomized Trial of Intracoronary Streptokinase in Acute Myocardial Infarction

View Full Paper
KJKennedy JwRJRitchie JlDKDavis Kb

Key Points

  • This trial aims to assess the impact of intracoronary streptokinase on mortality rates in patients after an acute myocardial infarction.
  • Randomly assigned 134 patients to receive intracoronary streptokinase or standard care.

Structured PICO

Does intracoronary streptokinase reduce mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
250 patients with acute myocardial infarction
I
Intervention
Intracoronary streptokinase (4000 U per minute, begun approximately 4 1/2 hours after the onset of symptoms, for a total of 286,000 +/- 77,800 U over 72 +/- 24 minutes)
C
Comparator
Standard care after returning to the coronary care unit, immediately after angiography
O
Outcome
30-day and 1-year mortalityhard clinical

Intracoronary streptokinase reduces mortality in acute myocardial infarction, driven by patients who achieve successful coronary reperfusion.

Abstract

After cardiac catheterization and coronary arteriography, 134 patients who had had an acute myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to treatment with intracoronary streptokinase (4000 U per minute, begun approximately 4 1/2 hours after the onset of symptoms, for a total of 286,000 +/- 77,800 U over 72 +/- 24 minutes); 116 control patients received standard care after they returned to the coronary care unit, immediately after angiography. Preliminary results of this trial have been published in the Journal (1983; 309:1477-81). During the first 30 days, 5 deaths occurred in the streptokinase group and 13 occurred in the control group (3.7 vs 11.2 per cent, P = 0.02); during the first year, the corresponding figures were 11 and 17 deaths (8.2 vs. 14.7 per cent, P = 0.10). However, when a minor imbalance in the ejection fraction and infarct location between the two groups was adjusted by logistic regression, the difference in one-year mortality became significant (P = 0.03). In the streptokinase group, 2 of the 80 patients in whom perfusion was reestablished (2.5 per cent) had died by one year, whereas 3 of the 13 with partial reperfusion (23.1 per cent) and 6 of the 41 with no reperfusion (14.6 per cent) had died (P = 0.008). Mortality among patients with partial reperfusion was not significantly different from that among those without reperfusion (P greater than 0.90). No base-line clinical, angiographic, or hemodynamic variable was predictive of successful reperfusion, according to univariate and multivariate analyses. We conclude that intracoronary streptokinase reduces one-year mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction, but this improvement occurs only among those in whom thrombolysis results in coronary artery reperfusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jw et al. (1985) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69effad24f6a06657c21e1dbhttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198504253121701
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper