Digital tectonics is often discussed through design–production integration, computational form generation, and digital fabrication, yet frameworks that systematically explain how architectural knowledge is constituted in process remain limited. This study addresses that gap by approaching digital tectonics not as an instrumental or formal design approach, but as a knowledge regime. Methodologically, it combines a conceptual–genealogical approach with an onto-methodological reading strategy grounded in Deleuze’s ontology of becoming and De Landa’s assemblage methodology and develops a core reading matrix. The study shows that knowledge in digital tectonics intensifies across potential setup, the productive threshold, behavioral stability, and feedback. Within this model, architectural making knowledge is understood not as a fixed content represented in advance, but as an operative process that concentrates decision-making within production and is reorganized through feedback. The article concludes by proposing an analytical reading model that redefines digital tectonics not merely as a technical or formal category, but as an onto-methodological problem field in which architectural knowledge is constituted in process.
Kalkan et al. (Wed,) studied this question.