Abstract Objective Osteoporosis in men is a common but often neglected health problem. We aim to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab, zoledronic acid and alendronate in men with osteoporosis. Methods In this randomized, comparative, open-label study, 390 men with osteoporosis or osteopenia were included. They were randomized to receive the treatment of denosumab, alendronate, or zoledronic acid for 12 months. The percentage changes in bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS) and bone turnover biomarkers (BTMs) during the treatment were evaluated. Safety parameters were observed. Results The baseline characteristics were well balanced among the three groups. After 12 months of treatment, denosumab, alendronate and zoledronic acid significantly increased BMD by 4.83 ± 0.89%, 4.32 ± 0.77%, 5.18 ± 0.73% at lumbar spine, by 2.75 ± 0.51%, 2.50 ± 0.61% and 2.83 ± 0.59% at total hip, TBS was significantly increased by 2.44 ± 0.52%, 2.00 ± 0.64%, 2.29 ± 0.55%, respectively, without significant differences among the three groups. Serum levels of BTMs decreased significantly and similarly in all three groups (all P .05 vs. baseline). Denosumab and alendronate group had fewer adverse events than zoledronic acid group. Denosumab had similar efficacy in patients with different gonadal functions. In patients previously receiving bone resorption inhibitors, denosumab continued to increase BMD and TBS, but the increments were reduced by approximately 30% in BMD at lumbar spine compared with treatment-naive patients. Conclusion Denosumab, alendronate and zoledronic acid significantly and similarly reduced BTMs, increased BMD and TBS in men with osteoporosis, whether the gonadal function of patients was normal or decreased. Previous anti-bone resorption therapy may partially diminish the efficacy of denosumab.
Zhou et al. (Mon,) studied this question.