ABSTRACT We identify a spillover effect from Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) activity to CEO compensation. Previous research shows that post‐merger, acquiring CEOs receive higher pay with reduced sensitivity to negative performance. We demonstrate that CEOs who don't engage in M&A, but have compensation peers who do, also experience increased pay and decreased pay‐performance sensitivity for negative returns. Additionally, M&A activity significantly influences compensation peer group composition. Our results reveal the effect of peer M&A on compensation results from both labour market pressures and self‐dealing, contributing to explanations for the substantial rise in CEO compensation in recent decades.
Bick et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: