Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
L for RGBT tracking. In particular, we divided all samples into four parts including normal positive, normal negative, hard positive and hard negative ones, and aim to leverage their relations to improve the robustness of feature embeddings, e.g., normal positive samples are closer to the ground truth than hard positive ones. To this end, we design a multi-modal multi-margin structural loss to preserve the relations of multilevel hard samples in the training stage. In addition, we introduce an attention-based fusion module to achieve quality-aware integration of different source data. Extensive experiments on large-scale datasets testify that our framework clearly improves the tracking performance and performs favorably the state-of-the-art RGBT trackers.
Tu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: