PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 5, 2013Circulation86 citationsOpen Access

Using Benefit-Based Tailored Treatment to Improve the Use of Antihypertensive Medications

JSJeremy B. SussmanSVSandeep VijanRHRod Hayward

Key Result

Benefit-based tailored treatment for hypertension would prevent 900,000 more cardiovascular events and save 2.8 million more QALYs over 5 years compared to a treat-to-target approach.

Structured PICO

Does a benefit-based tailored treatment strategy improve cardiovascular event prevention and save more QALYs compared to a treat-to-target strategy in adults without prior cardiovascular disease?

P
Population
American adults aged 30 to 85 years with no history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or severe congestive heart failure (primary prevention), derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. Simulated population represents 176 million eligible US adults.
I
Intervention
Benefit-based tailored treatment (BTT) approach to antihypertensive medication management, where treatment is advanced if the estimated cardiovascular disease event reduction is >1.7% over 5 years or if observed systolic BP is >150 mm Hg.
C
Comparator
Treat-to-target (TTT) approach based on JNC 7 guidelines, where treatment is advanced to reach specific blood pressure goals (<140/90 mm Hg, or <130/85 mm Hg for patients with diabetes mellitus).
O
Outcome
Cardiovascular disease events prevented (coronary heart disease and stroke) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) saved over 5 years.composite

A benefit-based tailored treatment strategy for hypertension is more effective at preventing cardiovascular events and requires fewer medications than traditional treat-to-target guidelines.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 159% vs 74%

Limitations

  • Other sequelae of CVD (like congestive heart failure, claudication, and chronic kidney disease) were not included in the model

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for prescribing antihypertensive medications focus on reaching specific blood pressure targets. We sought to determine whether antihypertensive medications could be used more effectively by a treatment strategy based on tailored estimates of cardiovascular disease events prevented. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a nationally representative sample of American adults aged 30 to 85 years with no history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or severe congestive heart failure using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. We then created a simulation model to estimate the effects of 5 years of treatment with treat-to-target (treatment to specific blood pressure goals) and benefit-based tailored treatment (treatment based on estimated cardiovascular disease event reduction) approaches to antihypertensive medication management. All effect size estimates were derived directly from meta-analyses of randomized trials. We found that 55% of the overall population of 176 million Americans would be treated identically under the 2 treatment approaches. Benefit-based tailored treatment would prevent 900 000 more cardiovascular disease events and save 2.8 million more quality-adjusted life-years, despite using 6% fewer medications over 5 years. In the 45% of the population treated differently by the strategies, benefit-based tailored treatment would save 159 quality-adjusted life-years per 1000 treated versus 74 quality-adjusted life-years per 1000 treated by the treat-to-target approach. The findings were robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: We found that benefit-based tailored treatment was both more effective and required less antihypertensive medication than current guidelines based on treating to specific blood pressure goals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sussman et al. (2013) studied Hypertension (n=176,000,000). Benefit-based tailored treatment vs. Treat-to-target approach was evaluated on Quality-adjusted life-years saved per 1000 treated (in the 45% treated differently). Benefit-based tailored treatment for hypertension would prevent 900,000 more cardiovascular events and save 2.8 million more QALYs over 5 years compared to a treat-to-target approach.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05120770c113c9996a62b6https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.113.002290
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Value of low dose combination treatment with blood pressure lowering drugs: analysis of 354 randomised trials2003 · 1,246 citations
  2. 2The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure The JNC 7 Report2003 · 25,604 citations
  3. 3A Summary of the Effects of Antihypertensive Medications on Measured Blood Pressure2005 · 138 citations
  4. 4Treatment of Hypertension in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Blood Pressure Goals, Choice of Agents, and Setting Priorities in Diabetes Care2003 · 264 citations
  5. 5Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 381998 · 6,743 citations