A combination of plasma ACE2, Ang 1-7, and Ang II demonstrated high discriminatory performance for detecting breast cancer compared to healthy controls (AUC 0.9396; 95% CI 0.84-1.00).
Case-Control (n=38)
Do plasma ACE2 and angiotensin peptides discriminate treatment-naïve breast cancer patients from healthy controls?
Plasma ACE2 and the Ang 1-7/Ang II ratio show potential as discriminatory biomarkers for breast cancer, though larger validation studies are needed.
Effect estimate: AUC 0.9396 (95% CI 0.84-1.00)
Background: The renin-angiotensin system (RAS), traditionally known for its role in cardiovascular regulation, has also emerged as a key regulator of tumor progression and metastasis. Dysregulation of the RAS components has been implicated in breast cancer due to the significant presence of the RAS-related proteins in the breast tissue. This study aims to identify the dysregulated RAS components and investigate their potential as candidate biomarkers. Methods: A pilot case–control study was carried out with 21 treatment-naïve breast cancer patients and 17 healthy controls. Plasma levels of Ang 1-7, Ang II, ACE2 and selected cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and IFN-γ) were measured using LC-MS/MS and ELISA. ROC curves were used to assess changes in biomarker levels across the RAS components. Results: This pilot cohort showed evidence of altered circulating RAS-related analytes and IL-10 in treatment-naïve breast cancer patients compared with controls. The ratio of Ang 1-7/Ang II was reduced by over two-fold in breast cancer patients (p = 0.0442). While plasma ACE2 was significantly elevated in breast cancer patients (p = 0.0005), IL-10 was significantly suppressed (p = 0.0420). In exploratory logistic regression analysis, ACE2 showed potential as a classifier with improved discrimination when combined with Ang 1-7 and Ang II (AUC = 0.9396 95% bootstrap CI: 0.84–1.00, accuracy = 92.59% at the Youden-optimized threshold). However, due to the small sample size and methodological limitations, these findings require further validation. Conclusions: In this exploratory pilot study, plasma ACE2, the Ang 1-7/Ang II ratio, and IL-10 showed promising discriminatory performance. However, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require external validation in larger, prospectively enrolled cohorts before any clinical inference can be drawn.
Ghimire et al. (Tue,) conducted a case-control in Breast cancer (n=38). Biomarker assessment (ACE2, Ang 1-7, Ang II) vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Discriminatory performance of combined ACE2, Ang 1-7, and Ang II (AUC 0.9396, 95% CI 0.84-1.00). A combination of plasma ACE2, Ang 1-7, and Ang II demonstrated high discriminatory performance for detecting breast cancer compared to healthy controls (AUC 0.9396; 95% CI 0.84-1.00).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: