Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and native aortic stenosis carry distinct cerebrovascular risks that can be mitigated through preprocedural planning, embolic protection, and tailored therapy.
This review provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and minimizing stroke risk in patients with aortic stenosis, particularly those undergoing TAVR.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with a heightened burden of cardiovascular comorbidities, atrial fibrillation (AF), and progressive valvular calcification, all of which may contribute to cerebrovascular events across the disease continuum. However, true epidemiologic evidence establishing AS as an independent stroke risk factor remains limited, and much of the contemporary concern regarding stroke has shifted toward interventional management. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become the dominant therapy for severe AS, but periprocedural and early postprocedural stroke remain among its most clinically significant complications. This review integrates current knowledge on stroke pathways in native AS, AF, calcific embolization, hemodynamic alterations, and places them in context with procedural mechanisms unique to TAVR. We summarize evidence comparing stroke rates in TAVR versus surgical aortic valve replacement and examine anatomic, procedural, and patient-level drivers of embolic risk. Building on these mechanisms, we highlight contemporary stroke mitigation strategies including multimodality imaging for preprocedural planning, optimization of access and device selection, cerebral embolic protection devices, antithrombotic therapy tailored to individual indications, and structured postprocedural neurologic and rhythm monitoring. By integrating the natural history of AS with TAVR-specific embolic pathways, this review provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and minimizing stroke risk in patients across the spectrum of AS.
Boettger et al. (Wed,) conducted a review in Aortic Stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and stroke mitigation strategies vs. Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) was evaluated. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and native aortic stenosis carry distinct cerebrovascular risks that can be mitigated through preprocedural planning, embolic protection, and tailored therapy.