His bundle pacing preserved left ventricular ejection fraction compared to right ventricular pacing, which resulted in a 4% greater decline in LVEF after six months in high-risk patients.
RCT (n=92)
Open-label
4:3 ratio
No
Does His bundle pacing improve left ventricular ejection fraction and markers of collagen metabolism compared to right ventricular pacing in patients at high risk for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy?
His bundle pacing preserves left ventricular ejection fraction and reduces profibrotic biomarkers compared to right ventricular pacing in patients at high risk for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.
Effect estimate: Mean difference -4%
p-value: p=0.008
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular pacing (RVP) can result in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). It is unknown whether specific biomarkers reflect differences between His bundle pacing (HBP) and RVP and predict a decrease in left ventricular function during RVP. AIMS: We aimed to compare the effect of HBP and RVP on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and to study how they affect serum markers of collagen metabolism. METHODS: Ninety-two high-risk PICM patients were randomized to HBP or RVP groups. Their clinical characteristics, echocardiography, and serum levels of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), suppression of tumorigenicity 2 interleukin (ST2-IL), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1), and galectin 3 (Gal-3) were studied before pacemaker implantation and six months later. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were randomized to the HBP group and 39 patients to the RVP group. HBP failed in 10 patients, who crossed over to the RVP group. Patients with RVP had significantly lower LVEF compared to HBP patients after six months of pacing (-5% and -4% in as-treated and intention-to-treat analysis, respectively). Levels of TGF-β1 after 6 months were lower in HBP than RVP patients (mean difference -6 ng/ml; P = 0.009) and preimplant Gal-3 and ST2-IL levels were higher in RVP patients, with a decline in LVEF ≥5% compared to those with a decline of <5% (mean difference 3 ng/ml and 8 ng/ml; P = 0.02 for both groups). CONCLUSION: In high-risk PICM patients, HBP was superior to RVP in providing more physiological ventricular function, as reflected by higher LVEF and lower levels of TGF-β1. In RVP patients, LVEF declined more in those with higher baseline Gal-3 and ST2-IL levels than in those with lower levels.
Mizner et al. (Mon,) conducted a rct in Conduction disease at high risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (n=92). His bundle pacing vs. Right ventricular pacing was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 6 months (Mean difference -4%, p=0.008). His bundle pacing preserved left ventricular ejection fraction compared to right ventricular pacing, which resulted in a 4% greater decline in LVEF after six months in high-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: