Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
To learn how groups arrange themselves, pairs of students were observed in a cafeteria where interaction was encouraged and in a library where interaction was discouraged. In the former situation, people chose to sit across from one another while in the library people chose a distant seating pattern. Several paper-and-pencil instruments were used to gauge seating preference in casual, cooperating, competing, and co-acting groups. In general, casual groups prefer corner seating, cooperating groups to sit side-by-side, co-acting in a distant arrangement, and competing groups opposite one another. The role of eye contact in regulating spatial arrangements of small groups is discussed.
Robert Sommer (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: