PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 24, 1992BMJ140 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of enalapril and nifedipine in treating non-insulin dependent diabetes associated with hypertension: one year analysis.

JCJuliana C.N. ChanCCClive S. CockramMNM. Gary Nicholls

Key Result

Enalapril reduced albuminuria by 54% compared to an 11% reduction with nifedipine (p=0.006) in hypertensive patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes, but increased plasma creatinine.

Key Points

  • To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of enalapril and nifedipine in hypertensive patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes.
  • Randomized, double blind trial over one year
  • 102 patients allocated to enalapril or nifedipine with matching placebos
  • Main outcome measures included blood pressure, albuminuria, renal function, and glycaemic control.
  • Albuminuria fell by 54% in the enalapril group versus 11% in the nifedipine group (p=0.006).
  • Fractional albumin clearance achieved a 47% reduction in the enalapril group and a 3% increase in the nifedipine group (p=0.009).
  • Plasma creatinine concentration increased by 20% in the enalapril group compared to 8% in the nifedipine group (p=0.001).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=102)

Blinding

Double blind

Randomization

randomly allocated

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does enalapril improve albuminuria and renal function compared to nifedipine in hypertensive patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes?

P
Population
102 hypertensive patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes (44 with normoalbuminuria, 36 with microalbuminuria, and 22 with macroalbuminuria) from a single center in Hong Kong.
I
Intervention
Enalapril (up to 40 mg/day) plus matching placebo for nifedipine, with additional diuretics as needed, for one year.
C
Comparator
Nifedipine (median 60 mg/day) plus matching placebo for enalapril, with additional diuretics as needed, for one year.
O
Outcome
Blood pressure, albuminuria, and parameters of renal function and glycaemic control at one year.surrogate

Enalapril reduces proteinuria significantly more than nifedipine in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes, but requires more concomitant diuretic use to control blood pressure and increases plasma creatinine.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 54% vs 11%

p-value: p=0.006

Limitations

  • Longer follow up is required to clarify the importance of enalapril's antiproteinuric effect.
  • Longer follow up is required to clarify the importance of enalapril's antiproteinuric effect

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of enalapril and nifedipine in hypertensive patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes. DESIGN: One year double blind follow up of patients randomly allocated to either enalapril or nifedipine with matching placebos for the alternative drug. SETTING: Metabolic Investigation Unit, Hong Kong. SUBJECTS: 102 patients were randomised: 52 to nifedipine and 50 to enalapril. At baseline 44 patients had normoalbuminuria, 36 microalbuminuria, and 22 macroalbuminuria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood pressure, albuminuria, and parameters of renal function and glycaemic control. RESULTS: In patients who completed one year's treatment the median dose required by the nifedipine group (n = 49) was 60 mg/day; seven (14%) required additional diuretics. Of 41 patients given enalapril, 37 required the maximum dose (40 mg/day) and 27 (76%) required diuretics. At one year mean arterial blood pressures were similar in both groups. Albuminuria fell by 54% in the enalapril group and 11% in the nifedipine group (p = 0.006). Fractional albumin clearance ratio fell by 47% in the enalapril group and increased by 3% in the nifedipine group (p = 0.009). Creatinine clearance fell similarly in both groups but plasma creatinine concentration was increased by 20% in the enalapril group versus 8% in the nifedipine group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients taking enalapril often required diuretics to control blood pressure. Enalapril reduced proteinuria significantly more than nifedipine in the microalbuminuric and macroalbuminuric patients but increased plasma creatinine concentrations. Longer follow up is required to clarify the importance of enalapril's antiproteinuric effect.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chan et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in Hypertensive patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes (n=102). Enalapril vs. Nifedipine was evaluated on Blood pressure, albuminuria, and parameters of renal function and glycaemic control (p=0.006). Enalapril reduced albuminuria by 54% compared to an 11% reduction with nifedipine (p=0.006) in hypertensive patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes, but increased plasma creatinine.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e9a6f2c205f14b6c873f9https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6860.981
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Factors Determining the Blood Pressure Response to Enalapril and Nifedipine in Hypertension Associated With NIDDM1995 · 9 citations
  2. 2Enalapril and nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: a 6 month comparison.1990 · 12 citations
  3. 3Comparison between perindopril and nifedipine in hypertensive and normotensive diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. Melbourne Diabetic Nephropathy Study Group.1991 · 199 citations
  4. 4Equivalent Reduction of Proteinuria in Hypertensives by either Nifedipine GITS or Enalapril: Disparate Effects on Neurohormones and Ambulatory Blood Pressure and the Influence of Salt2008 · 10 citations
  5. 5Long‐term renoprotection by perindopril or nifedipine in non‐hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria2004 · 30 citations