Left ventricular septal pacing via a transvenous approach maintained acute LVdP/dtmax (1.0%) compared to reductions seen with right ventricular apex (-7.1%) and septum (-6.9%) pacing (P=0.001).
Observational (n=10)
Does left ventricular septal pacing improve acute hemodynamics compared to right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction?
Permanent transvenous left ventricular septal pacing is feasible and preserves acute left ventricular pump function compared to traditional right ventricular pacing.
Absolute Event Rate: 1% vs -7.1%
p-value: p=0.001
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular septal (LVS) pacing reduces ventricular dyssynchrony and improves cardiac function relative to right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing in animals. We aimed to establish permanent placement of an LVS pacing lead in patients using a transvenous approach through the interventricular septum. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten patients with sinus node dysfunction scheduled for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation were prospectively enrolled. A custom pacing lead with extended helix was introduced via the left subclavian vein and, after positioning against the right ventricular septum (RVS) using a preshaped guiding catheter, driven through the interventricular septum to the LVS. The acute hemodynamic effect of RVA, RVS, and LVS pacing was evaluated by invasive LVdP/dtmax measurements. The lead was successfully delivered to the LVS in all patients. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time shortened with experience. QRS duration was shorter during LVS pacing (144 ± 20 ms) than during RVA (172 ± 33 ms; P = 0.02 versus LVS) and RVS pacing (165 ± 17 ms; P = 0.004 versus LVS). RVA and RVS pacing reduced LVdP/dtmax compared with baseline atrial pacing (-7.1 ± 4.1% and -6.9 ± 4.3%, respectively), whereas LVS pacing maintained LVdP/dtmax at baseline level (1.0 ± 4.3%; P = 0.001 versus RVA and RVS). R-wave amplitude and pacing threshold were 12.2 ± 6.7 mV and 0.5 ± 0.2 V at implant and remained stable during 6-month follow-up without lead-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Permanent placement of an LVS pacing lead by transvenous approach through the interventricular septum is feasible in patients. LVS pacing preserves acute left ventricular pump function. This new pacing method could serve as an alternative and hemodynamically preferable approach for antibradycardia pacing.
Mafi-Rad et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Sinus node dysfunction (n=10). Left ventricular septal (LVS) pacing via transvenous approach vs. Right ventricular apex (RVA) and right ventricular septum (RVS) pacing was evaluated on Acute hemodynamic effect evaluated by invasive LVdP/dtmax measurements (p=0.001). Left ventricular septal pacing via a transvenous approach maintained acute LVdP/dtmax (1.0%) compared to reductions seen with right ventricular apex (-7.1%) and septum (-6.9%) pacing (P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: