BACKGROUND: Traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) is a time-critical emergency with substantial heterogeneity across prehospital systems. Standardized reporting using Utstein-recommended variables is essential to enable valid comparison and synthesis across studies. To map how prehospital TCA studies published between 2020 and 2025 report Utstein-recommended variables, assess adherence to core and supplementary elements, and identify gaps and variation in reporting practice. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance and reported according to PRISMA-ScR. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for English-language primary studies. Utstein-recommended variables were charted using a prespecified codebook and mapped to Utstein core and supplementary elements. Reporting completeness was summarized descriptively, and study-level reporting patterns were visualized using a heatmap and an UpSet plot. RESULTS: Fifty studies were included. Core elements were more consistently reported than supplementary elements (≥50% reported in 72.0% vs 12.0% of studies). Demographics and arrest etiology were almost universally reported (98-100%), whereas time-interval and dispatch-related variables were rarely reported, including time to first shock (0%), dispatch time variables (4.0%), and time to first CPR (2.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Reporting of Utstein-recommended variables in contemporary prehospital TCA studies is incomplete and uneven, with persistent underreporting of dispatch- and time-interval elements and limited co-reporting of key core variables required for comparability. Improved adherence to a minimum Utstein-aligned dataset, augmented by trauma-specific descriptors, may strengthen standardization and interpretability of the TCA evidence base. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Kakhki et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: