PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2017Physiological Reports20 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of multiple non-invasive methods of measuring cardiac output during pregnancy reveals marked heterogeneity in the magnitude of cardiac output change between women

View Full Paper
JPJohn W. PetersenJLJing LiuYCYueh‐Yun Chi

Key Result

The Doppler determined VTI method provided the lowest beat-to-beat variability for measuring cardiac output during pregnancy, which showed marked heterogeneity in first-trimester rise (-3 to 55%).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=10)

Structured PICO

Which non-invasive method of measuring cardiac output provides the least variability in pregnant women?

P
Population
10 patients with spontaneous pregnancy
I
Intervention
Serial measures of cardiac output using echocardiographic methods (Teichholz method, Simpson's biplane method, and Doppler determined velocity time integral [VTI] method) and impedance cardiography (Bioz Dx device)
C
Comparator
Comparison among the different non-invasive measurement methods
O
Outcome
Beat-to-beat variability of cardiac output measurement and percent change in cardiac output during pregnancysurrogate

The Doppler determined VTI method is recommended for estimating cardiac output in pregnancy due to its lower beat-to-beat variability compared to other non-invasive methods.

Abstract

Various non-invasive methods are available to measure cardiac output (CO) during pregnancy. We compared serial measures of CO using various methods to determine which provided the least variability. Ten patients with spontaneous pregnancy had estimation of CO at baseline prior to becoming pregnant and at the end of the first and third trimesters. Echocardiographic data were used to estimate CO using the Teichholz method, Simpson's biplane method, and the Doppler determined velocity time integral (VTI) method. In addition, a Bioz Dx device was used to estimate CO by impedance cardiography. CO estimated with the VTI method had the lowest beat-to-beat variability. CO estimated with the VTI method was higher than CO estimated with the 2D-Teichholz method and Simpson's method. The percent change in CO during pregnancy was similar for all echo methods (VTI, Teichholz, and Simpson's biplane). Baseline CO determined with impedance cardiography was higher than CO determined with the VTI method. However, change in CO during pregnancy was significantly lower when measured with impedance cardiography. There was marked heterogeneity in the degree of rise in CO during the first trimester (-3 to 55%). The wide variation in the gestational rise in CO was unexpected, and at least in part secondary to variable increase in heart rate. We recommend the use of the Doppler determined VTI method for the estimation of CO in pregnancy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Petersen et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Spontaneous pregnancy (n=10). Non-invasive methods of measuring cardiac output (VTI, Teichholz, Simpson's, impedance cardiography) vs. Intra-patient comparison of methods was evaluated on Variability and magnitude of cardiac output change. The Doppler determined VTI method provided the lowest beat-to-beat variability for measuring cardiac output during pregnancy, which showed marked heterogeneity in first-trimester rise (-3 to 55%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f20241cf410a93242637dhttps://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13223
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Measurement of cardiac output by impedance cardiography under various conditions1979 · 73 citations
  2. 2Pressure-Flow Studies in Man: Effect of Respiration on Left Ventricular Stroke Volume1973 · 138 citations
  3. 3Changes in hemodynamics, ventricular remodeling, and ventricular contractility during normal pregnancy: A longitudinal study1997 · 129 citations
  4. 4Serial Assessment of the Cardiovascular System in Normal Pregnancy1997 · 359 citations
  5. 5Non-invasive assessment of gestational hemodynamics: benefits and limitations of impedance cardiography versus other techniques2013 · 34 citations