Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The development of an elevator scheduling system by undergraduate students is presented. The development was performed by 20 teams of undergraduate students, divided into two groups. One group produced specifications by employing a formal method that involves only first-order logic. The other group used no formal analysis. The solutions of the groups are compared using the metrics of code correctness, conciseness, and complexity. Particular attention is paid to a subset of the formal methods group which provided a full verification of their implementation. Their results are compared to other published formal solutions. The formal methods group's solutions are found to be far more correct than the informal solutions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sobel et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f99764fb650da4ffe4c0b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/32.991322
Ann E. Kelley Sobel
Michael R. Clarkson
Cornell University
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
Cornell University
Miami University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...