Does the addition of parental BMI to a child's BMI improve the prediction of the child's later eligibility for bariatric surgery in adulthood?
Incorporating parental BMI alongside a child's BMI significantly improves the prediction of the child's future risk of meeting criteria for bariatric surgery in adulthood.
CONTEXT: Obesity in children is a major public health concern. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the value of using parent-child dyads' adiposity status for predicting the individual's later eligibility for bariatric surgery (EBS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The cohort consisted of 2647 individuals from the longitudinal Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Baseline information included own and parental body mass index (BMI) in 1980 (children aged 3-18 years), whereas adult follow-up assessment examined EBS 21-31 years later. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: EBS in adulthood was defined as: 1) BMI greater than 40 kg/m(2) or 2) BMI greater than 35 kg/m(2) with at least one of the following metabolic complications: type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. RESULTS: Addition of parents' BMI improved the prediction of adulthood EBS compared to the model including child's BMI, age, and sex (area under the curve values 95% confidence interval (0.80 0.74-0.85 vs 0.74 0.68-0.81, P = .003). Obese children with an obese parent had a 21.2% chance of being EBS in adulthood. Compared to nonobese families, the risk ratio for EBS was 14.2 (95% confidence interval 8.0-25.2, P < .001) in obese children with an obese parent. The absolute risk of EBS was 30.9% if both child and parent were obese on more than one childhood assessment compared to 15.2% if they were obese only once, or 2.1% if they were never obese (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: These longitudinal data show that a combination of the child's and parents' BMI at baseline assessment is a useful predictive tool for assessing later EBS, and highlights the importance of accounting for parental BMI in the assessment of child obesity.
Juonala et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: