Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Research contends that internal capital should be allocated in proportion to divisional performance, but scholars are often puzzled to find that managers do not adhere to this winner‐picking approach. We argue this is because scholarship has not incorporated corporate‐level factors that influence how corporate managers structure holistic capital allocation strategies. In this study, we build on the behavioral theory of the firm to focus on analyst performance projections for multidivisional corporations and how they inform corporate managers' allocation strategies. Specifically, we theorize corporate managers deviate from the winner‐picking allocation approach owing to search‐related behaviors stemming from projected performance below or above expectations. We further theorize about conditions that offer corporate managers opportunities to deviate from winner‐picking, focusing particularly on multidivisional relatedness and asset durability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Busenbark et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a104906d478ddac0ffca051 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3331
John R. Busenbark
University of Notre Dame
Matthew Semadeni
Arizona State University
Mathias Arrfelt
Arizona State University
Strategic Management Journal
Arizona State University
Texas A&M University
University of Notre Dame
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...