Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The study takes into consideration the existing dynamic relationship between modernism, postmodernism and metamodernism as interpretive systems and philosophical currents successive in time, but overlapping. Providing benchmarks for their synchronic and diachronic approach, we support the idea that none of these currents does not exclude the others and does not deny their specific contribution to ensuring the overall development. Mainly, we suggested: an attempt for the conceptual foundation of the metamodernism and providing pragmatic benchmarks by quantifying certain aspects in a map of the attitudes which are generated by each doctrine, highlighting the weight of each of them.
Baciu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: