Diabetic subjects had a significantly higher mean carotid artery intimal medial thickness (0.95 mm) compared to non-diabetic subjects (0.85 mm).
Cross-Sectional (n=200)
Single-blind
No
Absolute Event Rate: 0.95% vs 0.85%
p-value: p=0.003
Background: Increase in intimal medial thickness (IMT) of the carotid arteries is contemplated as a guide to atherosclerotic vascular disease and subclinical organ damage and foretell cardiovascular disease. The study aimed to analyse IMT in non-diabetic and diabetic subjects. Subjects and Methods: There were 105 diabetic and 95 non-diabetic subjects in this study. Common carotid artery (CCA) IMT was calculated using a linear probe of a high-resolution ultrasound medical system. Results: Diabetic subjects (0.95 mm) showed significantly higher mean intimal medial thickness (IMT) when compared non-diabetic subjects (0.85 mm) (p <0.05). Correlation of IMT was seen with age, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL & LDL cholesterol and systolic blood pressure (SBP) in diabetic subjects. Total cholesterol, SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) showed a correlation with IMT in the non-diabetic subjects. Age, total cholesterol, SBP, and diabetes were independent risk factors for intimal medial thickness in multivariate linear regression analysis. Conclusion: Higher intimal medial thickness was seen in diabetic subjects when compared to non-diabetic subjects. We conclude that age, total cholesterol, SBP and duration of diabetes showed a significant correlation with IMT. IMT can be considered as a screening tool in diabetic patients for the early detection of atherosclerosis.
Vareed et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Diabetes Mellitus (n=200). Diabetes Mellitus vs. Non-diabetic was evaluated on Mean Carotid Artery Intimal Medial Thickness (CIMT) in mm (p=0.003). Diabetic subjects had a significantly higher mean carotid artery intimal medial thickness (0.95 mm) compared to non-diabetic subjects (0.85 mm).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: