PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1993California Management Review260 citations

Why Improving Quality Doesn't Improve Quality (or Whatever Happened to Marketing?)

View Full Paper
RKRaymond E KordupleskiRRRoland T. RustAZAnthony J. Zahorik

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Too often, quality programs fail to improve quality because they concentrate on internal processes which do not affect the customer. This is at least partially due to the alienation of marketing from the quality movement, a situation for which both sides are partially at fault. Ideally, marketing should serve as the eyes and ears of the organization, linking the external customer to managerial processes. One way to do this is to organize the collection of customer satisfaction measures around the managerial processes themselves. This forms a natural bridge from the customer to management and allows management to track the impact of quality improvements all the way from internal process measures to overall customer satisfaction and market share.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kordupleski et al. (1993) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11da6171528255b221a8d1https://doi.org/10.2307/41166745
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper