A Random Forest model using Genetic Algorithms and the Gini index for feature selection achieved 98.4% accuracy, 98.9% sensitivity, and 98% specificity in detecting heart disease.
A feature selection methodology using Genetic Algorithms and the Gini index optimized a Random Forest model to achieve 98.4% accuracy in heart disease detection.
Heart disease continues to be among the leading causes of mortality worldwide, necessitating its early detection for improving patient prognosis. Although conventional statistics-based algorithms and feature selection approaches have been applied for heart disease prediction purposes, the complex nature of medical data may not necessarily be accounted for using such techniques. Removing unnecessary features improves how well machine learning algorithms perform. In this study, we present a step-by-step feature selection methodology leveraging Genetic Algorithms (GA) and the Gini index. Utilizing greedy search for parameter tuning and and a comprehensive suite of confusion matrix metrics for evaluation, we compared six architectures: MLP, TabNet, Random Forest, SVM, Logistic Regression, and XGBoost are applied to the heart disease dataset. Our results demonstrate that the Random Forest (RF) model delivers superior diagnostics. By reducing the feature space from 13 to 8, the RF model attained exceptional predictive power, charting 98.4% accuracy, 98.9% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and a 98.5% F1-score.
Amshaher et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Heart disease. Random Forest model with feature selection (Genetic Algorithms and Gini index) vs. MLP, TabNet, SVM, Logistic Regression, and XGBoost was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy. A Random Forest model using Genetic Algorithms and the Gini index for feature selection achieved 98.4% accuracy, 98.9% sensitivity, and 98% specificity in detecting heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: