PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2009Clinical Research in Cardiology57 citationsOpen Access

Non-invasive imaging in the diagnosis of acute viral myocarditis

MJMichael JeserichSKStavros KonstantinidesGPG. Pavlik

Key Result

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as the most important non-invasive imaging tool for diagnosing acute viral myocarditis, allowing analysis of inflammation, edema, and necrosis.

Structured PICO

What is the role of non-invasive imaging, particularly cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, in the diagnosis of acute viral myocarditis?

P
Population
Patients with suspected acute viral myocarditis
I
Intervention
Non-invasive imaging modalities, primarily cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), as well as echocardiography and computed tomography
C
Comparator
Myocardial biopsy (traditional gold standard) or older nuclear techniques (indium-111 antimyosin antibody)
O
Outcome
Diagnosis of myocarditis (detection of inflammation, edema, necrosis, and functional parameters)

This review highlights cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging as the premier non-invasive diagnostic tool for acute viral myocarditis, overcoming the limitations of invasive biopsy and older radiation-based techniques.

Limitations

  • Endomyocardial biopsy is invasive and less sensitive due to the focal nature of the disease.
  • Nuclear techniques have declined due to radiation exposure and delay in imaging.
  • Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging cannot currently detect viral persistence.
  • Larger studies are warranted to further establish different CMR modalities in the diagnosis of myocarditis.

Abstract

Autopsy series of consecutive cases have demonstrated an incidence of myocarditis at approximately 1–10%; on the contrary, myocarditis is seriously underdiagnosed clinically. In a traditional view, the gold standard has been myocardial biopsy. However, it is generally specific but invasive and less sensitive, mostly because of the focal nature of the disease. Thus, non-invasive approaches to detect myocarditis are necessary. The traditional diagnostic tools are electrocardiography, laboratory values, especially troponin T or I, creatine kinase and echocardiography. For a long period, nuclear technique with indium-111 antimyosin antibody has been used as a diagnostic approach. In the last years, the use of this technique has declined because of radiation exposure and 48-h delay in obtaining imaging after injection to prevent blood pool effect. Thus, a non-invasive diagnostic approach without radiation and online image availability has been awaited. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging has these promising characteristics. With this technique, it is possible to analyse inflammation, oedema and necrosis in addition to functional parameters such as left ventricular function, regional wall motion and dimensions. Thus, cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as the most important imaging tool in the diagnostic procedure and the review focus on this field. But there are also advances in echocardiography and computer tomography, which are described in detail.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jeserich et al. (2009) conducted a review in Acute viral myocarditis. Non-invasive imaging (Cardiac magnetic resonance) vs. Endomyocardial biopsy was evaluated. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as the most important non-invasive imaging tool for diagnosing acute viral myocarditis, allowing analysis of inflammation, edema, and necrosis.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153562cb801b7f954e36f4https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-009-0069-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper