A combination of eight samples from the minimal T-wave representation identified normal from abnormal repolarization significantly better than the heart rate-corrected QT interval.
Observational (n=21)
Does minimal T-wave representation correctly classify drug-induced repolarization changes in subjects receiving d,l-sotalol?
Minimal T-wave representation is a potential new tool to identify abnormal repolarization in drug safety studies.
Absolute Event Rate: 56% vs 48%
p-value: p=0.04
BACKGROUND: Recently, numerous models and techniques have been developed for analyzing and extracting features from the T wave which could be used as biomarkers for drug-induced abnormalities. The majority of these techniques and algorithms use features that determine readily apparent characteristics of the T wave, such as duration, area, amplitude, and slopes. METHODS: In the present work the T wave was down-sampled to a minimal rate, such that a good reconstruction was still possible. The entire T wave was then used as a feature vector to assess drug-induced repolarization effects. The ability of the samples or combinations of samples obtained from the minimal T-wave representation to correctly classify a group of subjects before and after receiving d,l-sotalol 160 mg and 320 mg was evaluated using a linear discriminant analysis (LDA). RESULTS: inhibition by d,l-sotalol and that the most pronounced repolarization changes were present in the ascending segment of the minimal T-wave representation. CONCLUSIONS: The minimal T-wave representation can potentially be used as a new tool to identify normal from abnormal repolarization in drug safety studies.
Shakibfar et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Healthy subjects (n=21). Minimal T-wave representation (8 samples) vs. Heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTcF) was evaluated on Correct classification of baseline versus sotalol-affected ECGs at 3.5 hours post-dose (p=0.04). A combination of eight samples from the minimal T-wave representation identified normal from abnormal repolarization significantly better than the heart rate-corrected QT interval.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: