Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Summary Data arising from sample surveys are usually the result of complex survey design involving such techniques as stratification, multistage selection and the use of auxiliary information through unequal probability selection. These resulting data are often analysed using regression techniques without further regard to the sample design. This paper shows that, in general, ordinary least squares (OLS) regression will be biased in this situation even for large samples, although in the important class of most epsem designs asymptotic unbiasedness of least squares estimation is preserved. Alternative estimators are considered which yield unbiased estimates of the simple regression coefficient. Variances of all the estimators are derived and comparisons made. The usual OLS estimator of variance is also examined and found to be biased in general, even when used in conjunction with an epsem design for which the OLS estimator itself is unbiased.
Nathan et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: