PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2010Management Science124 citationsOpen Access

Is Regime Switching in Stock Returns Important in Portfolio Decisions?

View Full Paper
JTJun Tu

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The stock market displays regime switching between upturns and downturns. This paper provides a Bayesian framework for making portfolio decisions that takes this regime switching into account, together with asset pricing model uncertainty and parameter uncertainty. The findings reveal that the economic value of accounting for regimes is substantially independent of whether or not model and parameter uncertainties are incorporated: the certainty-equivalent losses associated with ignoring regime switching are generally above 2% per year and can be as high as 10%. These results suggest that the more realistic regime switching model is fundamentally different from the commonly used single-state model, and hence should be employed instead in portfolio decisions irrespective of concerns about model or parameter uncertainty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jun Tu (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a155639b2e0231f1582514bhttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1181
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The effect of estimation risk on optimal portfolio choice1976 · 562 citations
  2. 2The equity premium: A puzzle1985 · 5,779 citations
  3. 3Prediction and Decision Problems in Regression Models from the Bayesian Point of View1965 · 227 citations
  4. 4The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns1992 · 15,122 citations
  5. 5Predicting stock returns☆2006 · 167 citations