Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The debate over the future of East Asian democracy centers largely on the fit between democratic values and the Confucian way of life. Some interpret Confucianism's hierarchical, communitarian, and anti-pluralistic values as a roadblock to democratic consolidation. Others interpret the Confucian traditions of dissent and accountability as comparable to liberal institutions. This article surveys this scholarly debate by dividing the literature into three theoretical camps: compatibility, incompatibility, and convergence. Additionally, the few available empirical works on the Confucian-democratic dynamic are discussed and the findings are applied to the three categorizations. This review article maintains that a consensus on the relationship between Confucianism and democracy remains elusive due to the divergent conceptualizations and operationalizations of the two doctrines.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Spina et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a156a1179ff98d0de4e9983 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1468109910000265
Nicholas Spina
Slippery Rock University
Doh Chull Shin
University of California, Irvine
DANA CHA
Japanese Journal of Political Science
University of Missouri
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: