PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 31, 2019Research Evaluation103 citationsOpen Access

Normal versus extraordinary societal impact: how to understand, evaluate, and improve research activities in their relations to society?

View Full Paper
GSGunnar SivertsenIMIngeborg Meijer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Societal impact of research does not occur primarily as unexpected extraordinary incidents of particularly useful breakthroughs in science. It is more often a result of normal everyday interactions between organizations that need to create, exchange, and make use of new knowledge to further their goals. We use the distinctions between normal and extraordinary societal impact and between organizational- and individual-level activities and responsibilities to discuss how science–society relations can better be understood, evaluated, and improved by focusing on the organizations that typically interact in a specific domain of research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sivertsen et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1661c6c0a26745e04c557dhttps://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz032
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper