PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1996Journal of Contemporary China150 citations

Economic performance and political mobility: Chinese provincial leaders

View Full Paper
ZBZhiyue BoRoosevelt University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Chinese provincial leaders, unlike their counterparts in a democratic system, are not elected but selected. Hence the criteria by which the center uses to select and retain provincial leaders would be critical for the political mobility of provincial leaders. As China has been a developmental state since 1949, it is not unreasonable to expect that the center would retain or promote or demote provincial leaders according to the economic performance of their provinces. To test the hypothesis, I conducted multinomial regressions with a data set of Chinese provincial leaders between 1949 and 1994 in thirty provincial units. As the results show, the political mobility of provincial leaders is determined not only by the political movements of the PRC but also by the economic performance of the provincial leaders. The worse the economic performance record the more likely the provincial leader will be demoted. Moreover, the revenue contributions of the province during the provincial leader's tenure are also a determinant of the political mobility of the provincial leader.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhiyue Bo (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1713e362528a85c605832chttps://doi.org/10.1080/10670569608724246
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper