Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
There is evidence that warming leads to greater evapotranspiration and surface drying, thus contributing to increasing intensity and duration of drought and implying that mitigation would reduce water stresses. However, understanding the overall impact of climate change mitigation on water resources requires accounting for the second part of the equation, i.e., the impact of mitigation-induced changes in water demands from human activities. By using integrated, high-resolution models of human and natural system processes to understand potential synergies and/or constraints within the climate-energy-water nexus, we show that in the United States, over the course of the 21st century and under one set of consistent socioeconomics, the reductions in water stress from slower rates of climate change resulting from emission mitigation are overwhelmed by the increased water stress from the emissions mitigation itself. The finding that the human dimension outpaces the benefits from mitigating climate change is contradictory to the general perception that climate change mitigation improves water conditions. This research shows the potential for unintended and negative consequences of climate change mitigation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mohamad Hejazi
King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center
Nathalie Voisin
United States Geological Survey
Lu Liu
Peter Doherty Institute
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
University of Maryland, College Park
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Joint Global Change Research Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hejazi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a180dfd8008e5848e6f5ada — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421675112