Abstract Objective: This research aims to explicate the theory of "Freedom of Freedom" as the driving engine of transition from a centralized, controlling civilization to one based on human agency and distributed structures. Method: This study is a form of fundamental theorizing with an interdisciplinary approach. Data and documentation were collected through documentary and library research from authoritative global sources (Amartya Sen, Acemoglu & Robinson, Vienna Declaration, Castells, Zuboff, Piketty, Fanon, Freire, Benkler, Ostrom, Rifkin, Van Parijs) as well as the researcher's own practical research, including eight articles with DOI identifiers. Findings: The theory consists of four pillars: (1) Civilizational man is contingent upon liberation, (2) Structural institutions that promote and protect freedom, (3) The organic unity of all forms of freedom, (4) Obstacles to freedom as obstacles to civilizational transition. Findings indicate that these pillars align with comparative studies in religions, indigenous cultures, international law (solidarity rights, third generation of human rights), liberation movements (Fanon, Freire), world systems (Marcuse, Wallerstein), and emerging technologies (Zuboff, Russell, UNESCO). Furthermore, the objective realities of the past five decades (the internet revolution, participatory economy, open-source and blockchain movements, educational transformation, environmental crisis) testify to the gradual realization of these pillars. Subsequently, enablers (technological, socio-cultural, economic, political-structural) and inhibitors (surveillance capitalism, wealth concentration, digital divide, institutional capture, splinternet, cloud infrastructure centralization) are identified and their common patterns extracted. Conclusion: The "Freedom of Freedom" theory, by presenting a three-phase roadmap (network awakening, parallel institution-building, organic replacement) and three-layer safeguarding mechanisms (technological, cognitive, structural), transforms from an analytical framework into an executive guideline for civilizational pioneers.
غلامرضا رضائی (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: