PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Five-year outcomes of osimertinib-based treatment in a phase III study comparing EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy and EGFR-TKI with inserted cisplatin plus pemetrexed as a first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non–small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation (JCOG1404/WJOG8214L).

View Full Paper
SKShintaro KandaShinshu University HospitalTMTomonori MizutaniNational Cancer Centre JapanSNShogo NomuraJapan Clinical Cancer Research Organization

Key Points

  • Assess the five-year outcomes of osimertinib-based versus monotherapy in advanced EGFR-mutated lung cancer patients.
  • Randomized phase III trial with two treatment arms: standard arm (EGFR-TKI alone) and experimental arm (EGFR-TKI plus chemotherapy).
  • Participants included 193 patients with advanced EGFR-NSqNSCLC, between ages 20 to 74, with performance status 0 or 1.
  • Treatment followed a regimen of EGFR-TKI, followed by cisplatin and pemetrexed in the experimental arm.
  • Median overall survival: 54.0 months in standard arm vs. 50.4 months in experimental arm (HR, 0.984; p = 0.9279).
  • Five-year overall survival rates: 43.9% for standard arm and 40.4% for experimental arm.
  • Median progression-free survival: 20.4 months in standard arm vs. 25.2 months in experimental arm (HR, 0.902; p = 0.5147).

Abstract

8649 Background: JCOG1404/WJOG8214L was an open label, multicenter, randomized phase III study comparing EGFR-TKI monotherapy (gefitinib Gef or osimertinib Osi) and EGFR-TKI with inserted cisplatin plus pemetrexed as a first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non–small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation ( EGFR -NSqNSCLC). In the primary analysis, the insertion of platinum-doublet chemotherapy after the initial response to EGFR-TKI could improve progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS) compared with EGFR-TKI monotherapy (Clin Cancer Res 2025;31:2317-26). This study was commenced using Gef in December 2015 and was switched to Osi in October 2018. 501 patients (pts) (308 in the Gef cohort, 193 in the Osi cohort) were enrolled to October 2020, but it resulted in later accrual and shorter follow-up for the Osi cohort at the time of the primary analysis (data cutoff November 2022; median follow-up of all randomized patients 36.0 months). Therefore, we conducted the five-year (5y) follow-up analysis of the Osi cohort. Methods: The key eligibility criteria were pts with advanced or recurrent EGFR -NSqNSCLC (exon 19 deletion or exon21 L858R), age 20 to 74 years, and PS 0 or 1. In the standard arm (SA), Gef or Osi was administrated until disease progression. In the experimental arm (EA), Gef or Osi was administered on days 1-56. Then, after a two-week drug-free period, three cycles of cisplatin and pemetrexed were administered on days 71, 92, and 113. Thereafter, Gef or Osi was reinitiated on day 134 and continued until disease progression. Results: From October 2018 to October 2020, 193 pts were enrolled in the Osi cohort (97 pts in SA and 96 pts in EA). Median follow-up was 64.8 months. Advanced stage and recurrent disease were 79% and 21%, female and male were 63% and 37%, exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R were 54% and 46%, PS 0 and 1 were 50% and 50%, ≥ 65 year and < 65 year were 57% and 43%, central nerve metastasis (+) and (-) were 27% and 73%, respectively. Median OS were 54.0 months (95% confidence interval CI 44.4 to 66.0) in SA and 50.4 months (95% CI 43.2 to 69.6) in the EA (HR, 0.984; 95% CI, 0.684-1.415; p = 0.9279). 5y OS were 43.9% and 40.4%, respectively. Median PFS were 20.4 months (95% CI 14.4 to 28.8) in SA and 25.2 months (95% CI 18.0 to 33.6) in EA (HR, 0.902; 95% CI, 0.663-1.227; p = 0.5147). 5y PFS were 14.3% and 16.3%, respectively. Conclusions: The insertion of platinum-doublet chemotherapy after the initial response to Osi could not improve PFS and OS of pts with advanced EGFR -NSqNSCLC. On the other hand, JCOG1404/WJOG8214L demonstrated that Osi-based first-line treatment achieved 5y PFS in approximately 15% of this population, providing a benchmark for emerging Osi-based strategies. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020242.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kanda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192ed7fab5b468c441811chttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.8649
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 126P Prognostic factors and outcomes of patients (Pts) with advanced NSCLC while on osimertinib (Osi) treatment (Tx): A retrospective database study2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Real-world outcomes of pemetrexed-platinum chemotherapy plus osimertinib after progression on first-line osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.2024
  3. 34O First-line (1L) osimertinib (osi) ± platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) advanced NSCLC: FLAURA2 post-progression outcomes2024 · 24 citations
  4. 410P Safety and tolerability of first-line (1L) osimertinib (osi) ± platinum-pemetrexed in EGFRm advanced NSCLC: Data from FLAURA22024 · 5 citations
  5. 5Osimertinib (osi) after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients (pts) with unresectable stage (stg) III epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) NSCLC: Primary results of the phase 3 LAURA study.2024 · 12 citations